|
Since
1947, about one out of every five years has been a wave year. Of these, around
one out of every five waves is a great wave. If the U.S. Air Force had not shut down Project Blue Book
in 1969, and were still evaluating UFO sightings, an average non-wave year
would bring in around 500 reports. In contrast to this, the less frequent
wave year would yield about 1,000 reports (as derived from Blue Book's yearly
total report tallies from 1953-1968). However, since a wave usually only lasts a few
months or weeks, the portion of the year where the wave primarily manifests
shows an increase of approximately three times greater than normal (based on
the monthly average for a wave with an intense phase lasting three
months). For a great wave, the most active months would produce
sightings more like six times greater than normal (or even beyond that; the
head of Blue Book during the great wave of 1952 stated that at the height of
the flap they were receiving 20 or more reports a day with Unknowns
comprising 40% of all reports).
It would have been considered normal if Blue Book had collected 43
reports in a given month, but if they had 129 reports, that would have been
considered a typical wave month (or "flap" as they termed it). Do
not be surprised if we experience similarly large numbers in the coming
spring months.
Only
about one out of ten sightings are truly a UFO while, at the same time, it is
commonly believed by researchers that no more than one out of ten sightings
ever get reported. Because of this situation, I estimate that the above
Blue Book figures give a good estimate of what the total number of true UFOs
would be in the United States under ideal circumstances. In other words these numbers would
come close (although probably a conservative estimate) to the figure of
remaining Unidentifieds if all sightings were reported, contained sufficient
information for evaluation, and were thoroughly investigated. However,
the total reports for the year 1952 appear lower than they should be. Edward J. Ruppelt conveyed in his "The
Report on Unidentified Flying Objects" (1956) that while heading Blue
Book in July of '52, they were so busy with incoming reports that they had no
time to investigate or evaluate the foreign reports that were arriving.
Also, Ronald D. Story in his "The UFO Encyclopedia" gives a figure almost
30% greater than Blue Book's final official estimate of the total sightings
for that year.
There is one factor not considered in the estimates above that could
significantly affect the true figure. Normally a witness to a UFO is
totally caught off guard by the experience. If a few thousand people
had advance knowledge of when a wave would occur and acted on that
information, what would happen?
If people in such numbers scheduled a few hours a week during the most
intense phase of the coming wave to search the skies, the reported sightings
during those months might be twice of what a typical wave year would
bring. So, under the
proper circumstances, a regular wave could become a great one. But
timing isn't quite everything; location is important as well.
An experienced researcher should already know the hot
spots to camp out at, but for most everyone else a study of the historical
record of activity can help pin down a good prospective area. As a
start in this direction, the Blue Book record of unknowns, when broken down
by state and after factoring in population density, would rate as
follows. The states that would be labeled 'top contenders' include New
Mexico, Montana, and North Dakota. Still, 'very good prospects' can also
be found in the states of New Hampshire, District of Columbia, Maine,
Mississippi, Alaska, Colorado, Oregon, Delaware, Wisconsin, and Texas.
The remaining 'just above average' states include Ohio, Idaho, Maryland,
Iowa, Virginia, Michigan, Florida, California, Arizona, Massachusetts (Boston
area), New Jersey (surrounding Newark), Kansas, and Oklahoma.
In regards to this list I feel it best to reveal a
controversial decision I made which affected it’s ordering. Reports for
the period of 1947 to 1952 were excluded since it appeared as if UFO's during
that time were targeting the areas from the state of Washington, south
through Oregon and California, and east through Nevada, Arizona, and New
Mexico. Although some fault can be found for this decision I still feel that
it gives a more accurate distribution for a preliminary list, especially in
assigning the states with the highest ranking. An updated list of state rankings can be found at this web
page:
http://home.pacbell.net/joerit/docs/ufo70hot.htm
It
should also be pointed out that some of the states' ratings could have
dropped slightly if there were a large number of military reports since they
were assigned a lower value than civilian ones. The reason for this is that often military sightings are
from jets in isolated areas of little or no population (especially Alaska) or
at high altitude, when there would normally be no chance to witness the
UFO. Also, some states in the
last category were moved up slightly in rank due to exceptional
circumstances. For example, in
the states of Massachusetts and New Jersey, four of the five unknowns were
all located within a strip of land that ranged between one and two percent of
the total land area of each state.
In Michigan, by the same ratio, the Unknowns were in areas of very low
population density, much less than the state average and thus deserving of a
higher position. California was
also raised up due to strong, though circumstantial evidence of a negative
bias on the part of Blue Book following the Cisco Grove (near Truckee) close
encounter of September 1964. The
last Unknown listed for California was three weeks before this sighting even
though 1965 through 1967 was an exceptional wave period. For those not familiar with this
report, it started with a lost hunter becoming stranded up a tree due to at
least two aliens and a robot bent on abducting him. He first attempted to chase the invaders away by shooting
arrows at the robot and, when that failed, frantically set torn pieces of his
clothes on fire and threw these down upon them. This ploy may have granted him some sense of security
until he found that there was no more ammunition to spare. Not surprisingly, Blue Book labeled
the report "Psychological."
Based on the frequency of reports prior to the apparent bias, there
should have been at least four more Unknowns and California's rank was raised
accordingly. It can be
pointed out here that Hynek and Vallee list a total of four very good reports
during this void period.
There may
be other states that deserve additional consideration for possible position
adjustment (perhaps Washington state for example), but that would require
more time than I had available.
The states that I chose to investigate were those that looked
obviously too low or too high on the ladder based on my prior knowledge of
sightings for those areas.
Since my
rating approximation has its limitations, one should not necessarily feel
left out if your home state is not included. For example, even though Pennsylvania is not listed, the
southeastern part of that state has had many good reports in the past (mostly
on a line from Middletown to Easton & Jonestown to Willow Grove; see
David Saunder's "UFOs? Yes!" on Orthoteny). [In hindsight I would mention here
that the southwestern portion of Pennsylvania, particularly the Pittsburgh
and Greensburg areas may have an even greater number of sightings than the
southeastern part of the state; but if so it may be due more from a better
record of sightings being kept by Stan Gordon, a very active investigator and
resident of that area, than from an actual greater frequency of the
phenomena]. Similarly, the vast
majority of sightings in North Carolina are concentrated in the lower half of
that state [again this may be due mostly to a very active Ufologist in that
area, George D. Fawcett]. During
the wave of 1989 to 1990, there were over two hundred sightings in the region
of Fyffe, Alabama. In New York, many people believe that on November 24,1992,
a UFO crashed into a remote area of South Haven Park adjoining North Shirley
on Long Island. Curiously, this
date and the time of my encounter in 1965 (the UFO was then hovering just three
miles west of the apparent crash sight), were sandwiched between a 13 and 32
month peak (averaging 8-9 weeks to either one) although November 1992 is also
when I estimate another cycle (not discussed here) had peaked [the cycle
referred to is the 3.19 year cycle which is discussed in my article on UFO
crashes]. There was a
flurry of activity in Stonewood (not far from Clarksburg), West Virginia
during the months of September and October 1993 (early September is my
estimate of a 21+ month peak).
West Virginia may not usually rate very high in its average frequency
of sightings but would no doubt earn an elevated position if it were being
considered in the category of high strangeness reports (see John A. Keel's
"The Mothman Prophecies").
In a like
manner, states ranked in the lower, 'just above average,' category should not
be underestimated. From December
1993, through May 1994, equipment set up by seismologists in Parkfield,
California, recorded unusual magnetic changes. Besides a possible relationship
to the January earthquake in Northridge, there may have been a UFO connection
as well. During the period of
the magnetic anomalies there were increased sightings in Ventura (primarily),
and Santa Barbara counties. In
the middle of this period was a 13-month cycle peak (also in line with 125
witness reports from western Michigan for March 7-21, 1994).
And
California may just end up riding atop the next incoming wave. At the dawn of the proposed period of
increased sightings, two newsworthy events occurred within California that
just might be UFO related. On December 14, a mysterious blackout affected
seven western states and British Columbia. There was no massive power consumption or storm to account
for the disruption.
But some problem developed along a sixty mile stretch of 500 kilowatt
line between Fresno and Tracy, triggering a glitch to develop in the power
switches at either the Los Banos or Coalinga substations, and causing the
"Pacific intertie transmission system" to shut down at 12:26am. Less than twelve hours later, at just
before noon of the same day, an unusual crash of a Lear jet into Fresno
occurred, killing both pilots and injuring at least fifteen people. The jet was returning from a military
exercise with the state's Air National Guard when one and then, in less than
a minute, the other engine failed. The civilian aircraft was acting as a
target in the training mission and was said to have been carrying sophisticated
radar equipment.
Lastly,
perhaps the experimental NASAX-31 supersonic jet was chasing a UFO before it
crashed in the desert north of Edwards AFB on January 19, 1995 (this air base
has had some impressive UFO reports in the past). While reportedly wrapping
up a test flight of the aircraft, specifically designed to greatly increase
maneuverability, the test pilot had to eject himself to avoid sudden
death. The news stories went
into surprising detail as to the jets dimensions, the number of these jets
and pilots assigned to them at Edwards, the special qualities and design
features of this craft, and the name of the manufacturers. One noticeable omission was any
possible reason for the crash or the time of its occurrence. Do more frequent and even stranger
events lie ahead for California?
In whatever location one may be, the best general area to dig-in for a
lengthy UFO vigil would be on top of a large hill, overlooking a sizeable
body of water (high voltage power lines in sight is also a plus), at or close
to a place having a history of reliable sightings over a long period of
time. To obtain a comprehensive
database of UFO reports you can either purchase a CD-ROM (Windows version
only) of the UFOCAT database
from the Center for UFO Studies or the *U* UFO Database on
diskette. The former has over
109,000 entries, but many of those are duplicates of single events from
several sources and likely contain many IFOs rather than UFOs. The latter has around 17,750 entries,
but the emphasis is on quality over quantity (with much less duplication or
IFOs).
|