Dr.
Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry: "If
there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents
which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least
with a high probability. There is no such document."
(Sunday Times.. London 23 November 1993)
There
is a lot of media hype, fueled by the scientific and orthodox medical
establishments, that HIV is the cause of AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency
Syndrome). This supposed etiological factor has formed the basis for
conducting researches into finding a cure.
However since AIDS was discovered nothing seems to be yielding fruits
in the way of finding a definitive cure based on these researches. Why
is this so? Obviously something must be wrong somewhere. Scientists
and researchers know a lot about retroviruses and HIV is just one of
the retroviruses. But retroviruses do not kill their hosts since they
depend on them for their survival. Why is the HIV retrovirus behaving
differently from its group? If HIV is the cause of AIDS, why do we get
some patients who manifest all the symptoms of AIDS without any demonstrable
HIV in their system? On the corollary, why do we have some people who
are HIV positive yet they do not manifest the AIDS symptoms?
From
what Dr. Kary Mullis said above, doesn't it surprise you that there
is no scientifically proven evidence that HIV is the cause of AIDS?
The questions are many but the required answers do not seem to be coming
from our 'authorities' who religiously maintain that HIV is the cause
of AIDS!
However,
there is a growing group of researchers who are beginning to question
the HIV-AIDS causation hypothesis. They constitute a 'dissident' group
from the 'loyalists' who officially chant the mantra that HIV is the
cause without any documented scientific proof!. These 'dissidents' are
saying that the virus myth hypothesis needs a thorough rethink. Find
out what these scientists are saying by CLICKING
HERE.
Related
Links:
More HIV-AIDS Controversy