| BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT return to the Fall 1998 Pros & Cons page | |||||||||||||||||||||
MEASURE C |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Berkeley Unified School District Appropriations Limit | |||||||||||||||||||||
| THE QUESTION Shall the Berkeley Unified School District spend the previously-voted tax monies to continue the special programs of the Berkeley Schools Excellence Project (BSEP) authorized by over 83% of Berkeley voters in 1994 under the Berkeley Public Schools Educational Excellence Act of 1994? THE SITUATION In 1994, voters approved a special tax for BSEP to generate education revenues for a period of 12 years starting with the 1995-96 fiscal year. The California Constitution places certain spending limits on governmental entities, including school districts. This is known as the "Gann limit," which requires that every 4 years there be a majority vote to spend the funds that are already being collected. s passed since that initiative. |
THE PROPOSAL This proposition, Measure C, would authorize the Berkeley Unified School District to continue to spend these tax revenues for the purposes set forth in the 1994 measure:
A YES vote means the money will be released and the above programs continued. A NO vote means the money will not be released, but will continue to be collected and presumably placed in a fund for future decision. |
SUPPORTERS SAY · This is not a vote for new taxes but a vote to be able to spend the money already being collected by the 1994 special tax to improve the schools a tax overwhelmingly approved by the voters. · The money is vital for the schools. These funds pay for almost 1/5 of the teachers, without whom class sizes would be greatly increased and valuable programs lost. · Without BSEP the District would have to cut other programs drastically to take advantage of the state-mandated size reduction. · If this measure is not passed, not only would the district lose funding for almost 1/5 of its teachers, but also it would likely be unable to implement state class size reductions in K-3 grades; and Grades 4-8 would average at least 32 students per teacher, with the high school, 35 per teacher. BSEP enrichment programs would be lost, as well as $1 million for educational materials.
|
OPPONENTS SAY · There is no formal opposition. |
||||||||||||||||||
| MAJOR SUPPORTERS Doris Fine, President, League of Women Voters; Mary Friedman, Executive Director, Berkeley Public Education Foundation; Jeffrey Shattuck Leiter, Chairman and CEO, M.F.K. Blake Estate, Inc.; Pedro Noguera, Assoc. Prof., Graduate School of Education,U.C. Berkeley; Jonathan O'Donnell, Chair, BSEP Planning and Oversight Committee. MAJOR OPPONENTS There is no formal opposition recorded in the Alameda County Voter Pamphlet. |
|||||||||||||||||||||